(1) include/makeinclude/wrapper_macros.GNU
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/2kAceRules.GNU
	We no longer needs to include 2kAceRules.GNU in the Makefile

(2) include/makeinclude/2kAceRules.GNU
	Add TAO_ORBSVCS to shrink the size of liborbsvcs.so
	(Only Naming/Property/Trader will be created.)

ace/config.h
	------ Do not check in --------
	Replace with new version of "config-sunos5.7.h"

ace/ACE_COMPONENTS.list
	------ Do not check in --------
	It is generated by the compilation

ace/Acceptor.h
	------ Do not check in --------

	Add #if defined(twoK) around adding friend class Dynamic_Service_Config
	Line:	249

	No concurrent strategy Line 320
	Line 322: comment out CONCURRENCY_STRATEGY defifnition
			in the private section.
	Multiple declaration for CONCURRENCY_STRATEGY

ace/Acceptor.i
	------ Do not check in --------
	No conflict ? It's strange.

ace/CORBA_macros.h
	------ Do not check in --------

ace/Makefile
	------ Do not check in --------
	Do not Add include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/2kAceRules.GNU

ace/Object_Manager.cpp
	------ Do not check in --------

	The Dynamic_Service_Config:;close() will be called since
	Dynamic_Service_Config is registered by ACE_Object_Manager::at_exit()
	while instanciating its class.


	Include "Dynamic_Service_Config.h"

	Add Dynamic_Service_Config::close() in ACE_Object_Manager::fini()

	class Dynamic_Service_Config make the use of singleton
	to avoid the order problem of initialization

	ACE_Object_Manager::fini()
	Change     Dynamic_Service_Config::close()
	       --> Dynamic_Service_Config::instance()->close()

(3) ace/Service_Config.h
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add friend class Dynamic_Service_Config
	Line:	302

=======================================================================
TAO/tao/Connect.cpp
	------ Do not check in --------

	This file is no longer used.

(4) TAO/tao/GIOP.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Moved from "Connect.cpp"
	add includes
	In TAO_GIOP::process_server_request()
		Server_Security_Strategy hook 
		Performance_Monitor hook 

		performance monitoring strategy analyze() method add new
		parameter TAO_ORB_Core *orb_core in order to dispatch from the
		analyze(). See Monitoring_Strategy.cpp

		I cannot get peer information here now.
		Remove peer argument from the security.
		I will pass dummy peer for the performance
		monitor.

	We have another dispatch_servant() call in
	TAO_GIOP::process_server_locate(). Which is for
	forwarding request. We have to check if we are
	going to apply the same security strategy or not.

	No definition of CORBA_NO_PERMISSION.
	Replaced CORBA_NO_PERMISSION with CORBA::NO_PERMISSION.
	New macro for throwing system exception.

	class Dynamic_Service_Config make the use of singleton
	to avoid the order problem of initialization

	TAO_GIOP::process_server_request()
	Change     Dynamic_Service_Config::domainConfigurator()
	       --> Dynamic_Service_Config::instance()->domainConfigurator()
		(Change two places in this function)


(5) TAO/tao/IIOP_Transport.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Moved from "Invocation.cpp"
	add includes
	In TAO_IIOP_Client_Transport::start_request()
		Client_security_strategy hook

	class Dynamic_Service_Config make the use of singleton
	to avoid the order problem of initialization

	TAO_IIOP_Client_Transport::start_request()
	Change     Dynamic_Service_Config::domainConfigurator()
	       --> Dynamic_Service_Config::instance()->domainConfigurator()

	(*) We had better modify TAO_GIOP::write_request_header()
            instead of this function
            to minimize the point of modification. Think about it later.

TAO/tao/Invocation.cpp
	We no longer does not modify this file because of the structual
	change of TAO in ver1.0

(6) TAO/tao/Makefile
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add LIBS += -lACE2k

	Do not Add include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/2kAceRules.GNU
	insert includes.

	There is an dependency libTAO.so => libDynamicConfigurator.so
	and libACE2k.so
	So adding -lDynamicConfigurator -lACE2k to LIBS macro.

	Now the linker can detect the dependency of libTAO.so

	We no longer have to explicitly link -lACE2k -libTAO2k
	-lSimpleConfigurator -lDynamicConfigurator to compile
	application programs.

(7) TAO/tao/ORB.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------
	Adding resolve_dynconf() entry
	Adding call of resolve_dynconf() to CORBA_ORB::resolve_initial_references ()
	Adding CORBA::Environment argument to dynconf()

(8) TAO/tao/ORB.h
	------ checked in done ---------
	Adding resolve_dynconf() entry
	Adding CORBA::Environment argument to resolve_dynconf()

(9) TAO/tao/ORB_Core.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Adding includes
	Adding initialization of TAO_ORB_Core:
		dynconf_
		dynconf(DynamicCOnfigurator_i *)
		create_and_set_dynconf(CORBA::Environment&)

	We may have multiple ORB in the same process now.
	So we have one DynamicConfigurator per ORB
	Adding initialization of TAO_ORB_Table:
		dynconf_

	In create_and_set_dynconf(CORBA::Environment&)
//
//      Default collocation strategy for TAO 1.0 is THRU_POA.
//      So if we call dynamicConfigurator call before activating
//      POA Manager (usually through run() method of servant),
//      it will raise TRANSIENT exception.
//      To prevent this problem, we are going to activate POA manager
//      here. (through root_poa)
//

(10) TAO/tao/ORB_Core.h
	------ checked in done ---------

	Adding members of TAO_ORB_Core
		dynconf_
		create_and_set_dynconf(CORBA::Environment&)
		dynconf(DynamicConfigurator_i*)
		dynconf(CORBA::Environment&)

	Adding dynconf_ as a member of TAO_ORB_Table (which is a singleton)

(11) TAO/tao/ORB_Core.i
	------ checked in done ---------

	Adding dynconf(CORBA::Environment&)
	We no longer have TAO_OC_RETRIEVE() macro.
	Use just (this->dynconf_) instead.
 
(12) TAO/tao/Principal.h
	------ checked in done ---------
	Make destructor of CORBA_Principal public
	for principal security strategy

CC -mt -g -features=castop -DACE_LACKS_RTTI -noex  -DtwoK    -I. -I/projects/2k/personal/yamane/src.new/aw -I/projects/2k/personal/yamane/src.new/aw/TAO  -DtwoK   -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/java/include/solaris -DTAO_USES_DEPRECATED_TAO_TRY_MACROS  -c -PIC  -o .obj/principal_security_strategy.o principal_security_strategy.cpp 
"principal_security_strategy.h", line 20: Error: CORBA_Principal::~CORBA_Principal() is not accessible from Principal_Security_Strategy::~Principal_Security_Strategy().
"principal_security_strategy.h", line 20: Error: CORBA_Principal::~CORBA_Principal() is not accessible from Principal_Security_Strategy::~Principal_Security_Strategy().

(13) TAO/tao/Resource_Factory.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	add includes "dynamicConfigurator_i_.h"

	adding get_dynconf(void);
	adding set_dynconf(DynamicConfigurator_i *dc)
	We use TAO_ORB_Table singleton to get dynconf_ instead of
	GLOBAL_APP_ALLOCATED

(14) TAO/tao/Resource_Factory.h
	------ checked in done ---------

	class TAO_Resource_Factory is moved to here
	adding get_dynconf(void);
	adding set_dynconf(DynamicConfigurator_i *dc)

(15) TAO/tao/Server_Strategy_Factory.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add activate_server_connections(int) function to class
	Server_Strategy_Factory

(16) TAO/tao/Server_Strategy_Factory.h
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add activate_server_connections(int) function to class
	Server_Strategy_Factory

(17) TAO/tao/TAO_Internal.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add includes "Dynamic_Service_Config.h"

	TAO_Internal::open_services()
		Replace ACE_Service_Config::open() with
		Dynamic_Service_Config::instance()->open()

	class Dynamic_Service_Config make the use of singleton
	to avoid the order problem of initialization

	TAO_Internal::open_services()
	Change     Dynamic_Service_Config::open()
	       --> Dynamic_Service_Config::instance()->open()

(18) TAO/tao/UIOP_Transport.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Moved from "Invocation.cpp"
	add includes
	In TAO_IIOP_Client_Transport::start_request()
		Client_security_strategy hook

	class Dynamic_Service_Config make the use of singleton
	to avoid the order problem of initialization

	TAO_UIOP_Client_Transport::start_request()
	Change     Dynamic_Service_Config::domainConfigurator()
	       --> Dynamic_Service_Config::instance()->domainConfigurator()

	(*) We had better modify TAO_GIOP::write_request_header() instead of
	    this function to minimize the point of modification.
            Think about it later.

(19) TAO/tao/default_server.cpp
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add activate_server_connections(int) function to class
	TAO_Default_Server_Strategy_Factory

	A lot of changes. No strategy at all.
	Need investigation.

	concurrency_strategy will be defined and used in IIOP_Acceptor.cpp
	and UIOP_Acceptor.cpp

(20) TAO/tao/default_server.h
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add activate_server_connections(int) function to class
	TAO_Default_Server_Strategy_Factory

	Do I only need to port concurrency strategy?
	how about creation_strategy_ reactive_strategy_, threaded_strategy_
	default_creation_strategy_

	Add thread_per_connnection_use_timeout_(0)
	to the default constructor

TAO/dynamicConfiguratorC.cpp
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorC.h
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorC.i
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorS.cpp
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorS.h
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorS.i
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorS_T.cpp
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorS_T.h
TAO/dynamicConfiguratorS_T.i
	These files are not used.

(21) TAO/tao/orbconf.h
	------ checked in done ---------

	Add #define TAO_OBJID_DYNCONF "DynamicConfigurator"

TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Naming/*
	------ checked in done ---------

	We had a preliminary version of persistent name server.
	Override by the new one.

TAO/orbsvcs/Naming_Service/*
	------ checked in done ---------
	We had a preliminary version of persistent name server.
	Override by the new one.


------------------------------------------------------------------